The Miss Alameda Pageant, suddenly revitalized after 20 years by Barbara Walsh, is facing harsh criticism. Mary Jane Casper of County Tri-Valley chapter of the National Organization for Women was quoted in the Contra Costa Times "This is a bathing suit, evening gown competition held under the guise of a scholarship opportunity for young women. Why should these women sacrifice their dignity and self-respect by offering their bodies for judgment by some panel?"
"It's easy to point your finger and say this is demeaning to women," said Scott Walsh. "But I've met these women and I've heard from them how expensive college is."
I agree, college is expensive, but as a former Miss Colleen, Corona, CA 1989, I can tell you that there are much more valuable ways to earn money for college than to parade around on a stage competing against other women for respect and admiration based on appearance. The negative competition and divisiveness as well the negative body image issues are reasons enough for this pageant to die off 20 years ago.
So far, I haven’t been able to find the amount of the scholarship award for the Miss Alameda County winner, because they are still raising the money. Most local pageant scholarships aren’t even enough to pay for a single semester at a Cal State University. If it were enough to pay for your entire college career, is it really worth the the role model it sets for little girls?
In The Pleasanton Weekly Barbara Davies Walsh said that she doesn't think the pageant is outdated because the ideals it represents for the young women are timeless. You are right Barbara, sexism is timeless.
Recent Comments